In-depth interview (IDI)
Twenty communities where SS was actually conducted were chosen randomly out of a complete a number of two hundred towns where degree got happened ranging from , we.elizabeth. 1-3 years through to the questionnaire. Of each of these 20 SS towns, we chosen you to earlier in the day trainee to own a semi-prepared, in-depth interviews. Half have been chose randomly off an email list made by KHPT group of men and women who they personnel believe had gained off studies: additional 50 % of were chose at random on huge number off trainees. Each one of the picked SS trainees has also been questioned to determine anybody you like for interviews, someone having whom they shared a virtually relationships. These were not advised of one’s reason behind the fresh interviews. The latest interviews were used regarding local vernacular of the interviewers instructed during the semi-planned choosing. Questions incorporated their viewpoints with the SS training, trick knowledge attained and you can common, point of views to your private attitudinal and behavioral alter, and you may views with the alter owing to SS, among all of their loved ones as well as in the city. The IDI transcripts have been examined yourself to possess regular layouts and you can suggestions.
Polling Booth Studies (PBS)
Polling Booth Surveys (PBS) have been used by KHPT and others to obtain information on delicate subjects such as sexual practices; the methodology has been reported elsewhere . In summary, participants are interviewed in a group, though each person is behind a polling booth-type screen. The PBS sessions were conducted by trained PBS facilitators in the local vernacular in 40 villages: 20 where SS had been conducted in 2005, and 20 where no such training had been done. First we divided each village into 6 segments and randomly assigned each segment to one of the following 6 groups (unmarried women and unmarried men, younger married women applications de rencontre pour les seniors and men, older married women and men). In each segment, one house was selected at random as a “starter” house. In this home, we listed all members of the household. If any person satisfied the criteria for inclusion, we requested their participation (if there was more than one such person in the house, we selected one at random). Then working to the left, we followed the same procedure in each house until we had invited 12 people in the appropriate group, giving an approximate total invited sample of 1440 respondents in the 20 SS villages and 1440 in the 20 non-SS villages. We were able to poll 1196 respondents in SS villages (83% response) and 1297 (90% response) in other villages, with a combined sample of 2493 (87% response). In addition, as many SS trainees as possible from the 20 Stepping Stones villages, were convenience-sampled to participate in a separate PBS session. In all 414 former trainees were sampled. Questions were a mixture of ones used in previous KHPT PBS and some were taken from the GEM Scale . The questions focused on knowledge, attitude and behaviour and involved yes/no or don’t know/not applicable responses. The knowledge and attitude questions were the same for all groups, but the behaviour questions differed according to what was appropriate for the specific group. All PBS data were entered into Excel spreadsheets and differences between groups were calculated using a chi-squared test. Preliminary analysis found that the general population samples were very similar; however the SS group profile was different to that of the general population samples (p < 0.01, Table 1), so the data from the SS trainee group were adjusted directly, using the stratum-specific denominator of the SS general population group as the standard population. Differences between groups were then calculated in STATA version 10 (STATA Corporation, USA) and p values calculated using a z-test (test of equality between proportions).